India and the AUKUS Grouping – Drishti IAS

India and the AUKUS Grouping – Drishti IAS

    
This editorial is based on “India and the Anglosphere” which was published in the Indian Express on 15/02/2023. It discusses the Issue with the AUKUS Grouping and related implications for Asia and India.
For Prelims: Indo-Pacific region, AUKUS agreement, Quad, South China Sea, Applied AI, Quantum Technologies,
For Mains: Global Groupings, Important International Institutions, Bilateral Groupings & Agreements, Effect of Policies & Politics of Countries on India’s Interests
Recently, the US, UK and Australia have unveiled details of their plan to create a new fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, aimed at countering China’s influence in the Indo-Pacific region. Under the AUKUS pact Australia is to get at least three nuclear-powered submarines from the US.
The AUKUS agreement, which involves Australia acquiring nuclear-powered submarines with the help of the US and the UK, is being praised and criticized simultaneously. It is viewed as a means of strengthening deterrence and stability in the Indo-Pacific. However, China sees it as a dangerous alliance that the US is building in the area, along with the Quadrilateral forum or the Quad.
This pact will trigger multiple strategic consequences for Asia, including India. However, it is also an opportunity for India to develop a unique set of arrangements with the US and its allies.
Drishti Mains Question
How does the AUKUS grouping impact India’s strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific region and what should be India’s approach towards this new development?

Q. The new tri-nation partnership AUKUS is aimed at countering China’s ambitions in the Indo-Pacific region. Is it going to supersede the existing partnerships in the region? Discuss the strength and impact of AUKUS in the present scenario. (2021)

More Links
Archives by Date
Archives by Month & Year
What’s New
 

source

Leave a Comment

Leave a Comment

VA health researchers get 90-day reprieve, but mass layoffs ahead – USA TODAY

VA health researchers get 90-day reprieve, but mass layoffs ahead – USA TODAY

WASHINGTON − The Department of Veterans Affairs threw a 90-day lifeline to temporary researchers whose medical studies were plunged into uncertainty by the Trump administration’s sweeping layoffs and hiring freeze, but their fate remains uncertain.
President Donald Trump‘s government-wide hiring freeze threatened to wipe out hundreds of studies and clinical trials that are run through temporary VA appointments – scientific partnerships that have seeded landmark medical inventions from the invention of the pacemaker to the first CAT scan.
But this week, the VA quietly pulled back, extending some research terms that were set to expire in the next three months by 90 days, the VA confirmed to USA TODAY on Wednesday.
Scientists say the fate of important studies and trials funded by the VA’s development and research office still hangs in the air.
“You never know when we’re going to get hit with some new wild news that, you know, could just be completely devastating,” a researcher on a temporary VA appointment told USA TODAY. They asked to remain anonymous to safeguard their study, which involves opioid use among veterans.
The loss of a member of her team who was dropped by the VA in the wave of layoffs and appointment cancellations “is further delaying our progress on the project,” they said.
The VA did not publicly announce the 90 day extension. While a temporary reprieve, researchers said it still left unanswered questions – what happens at the end of the extension? And are personnel already let go by the agency gone for good?
The VA did not respond to those questions.
“This extension will ensure continuity of all VA research efforts while the department conducts a comprehensive assessment of ongoing research initiatives to evaluate their impact on Veteran health care,” spokesperson Peter Kasperowicz said in a statement.
The opioid use researcher said it was unclear what the new extension means for their study. The study had already lost one team member to the Trump layoffs. And because their own appointment ends in more than 90 days, and isn’t covered by the VA’s extension, “there’s also no clear solution for me.”
By firing administrative workers who may have appeared inessential to medical research and care, the Trump administration removed team members who were responsible for checking in with study subjects and doing patient follow up. The firings by Trump aide Elon Musk’s DOGE disrupted studies that were meant to follow patients over time, VA researchers and experts said.
Amid the Trump administration’s widespread cuts at federal agencies, the VA has already laid off 2,400 employees.
And it’s not over. According to a memo circulated among agency heads and previously reported by USA TODAY, the VA plans to lay off at least 76,000 more workers, which lawmakers and advocates fear could devastate the already short-staffed agency.
The VA exempted 300,000 positions from the hiring freeze, including direct caregivers, and has said “mission critical” positions and contracts were not wiped out in the layoffs.
But the chaos has already impacted the VA’s dual research appointments, a key system for medical research, sparking fear among scientists of serious ramifications down the line – and not just for veterans.
For decades, the VA has tapped doctors, professors and researchers from outside institutions to run temporary studies and clinical trials through dual appointments, a “cost effective” way for the VA to access experts on a limited basis, according to Elizabeth Stout of the National Association of Veterans’ Research and Education Foundation.
Congress designated $984 million for more than 7,270 active VA research projects last year. More than 3,680 principal investigators across 102 research sites are at work on the programs. Many of these scientists are on “without compensation” appointments, meaning the VA gets access to their work without paying for it – even though they are still technically federal employees.
Even those staff were caught up in the hiring freeze, which also included federal appointments. It remains unclear whether the VA’s extension will restore laid off researchers or disrupted studies.
Rashi Romanoff, NAVREF’s chief executive officer, said the “destiny” of researchers who have already been let go is uncertain. “Across VA’s research community, there’s been a lot of concern about the ability to sustain critical veterans research initiatives,” she said.
Over its century-long history, the VA’s research funding has produced a long line of scientific firsts, from the cardiac pacemaker to the CAT scan. VA researchers are behind key medical studies and technologies that impact veterans, but also the broader public, including prosthetics, PTSD and cancer.
“What is needed is research into why military service increases risk” of ALS, said Kuldip Dave, senior vice president of research at the ALS Association. ALS, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, is a severe nervous system disease that U.S. veterans are 1.5 times more likely to contract than the general population. Why is unknown.
“Veterans might be a smaller population to study, but what we find out there could be impactful for all patients,” he said.
More than 60% of VA researchers are also clinicians. Dave said that gives them the unique ability to apply what they learn in the lab to their patients.
“This is the only organization whose sole focus is to do research on veterans needs,” he said.
“This is not like, ‘Oh, if you cut VA personnel, the slack will be picked up by someone else.’ There is no slack to be picked up.”

source

Leave a Comment

Leave a Comment

Leave a Comment

More than 60 Texas workers laid off in U.S. Department of Education mass layoffs: records – Austin American-Statesman

More than 60 Texas workers laid off in U.S. Department of Education mass layoffs: records – Austin American-Statesman

More than 60 Texas-based U.S. Education Department employees were laid off Tuesday as part of the Trump administration’s efforts to slash the federal workforce, according to a document sent to union officials by the education agency.
The Education Department — a 45-year-old agency that President Donald Trump and its newly appointed head Linda McMahon have pushed to dismantle — terminated at least 25 attorneys in Texas specializing in civil rights. It also shuttered its Dallas office, laying off 27 employees; and terminated equal opportunity specialists in Fort Worth, Dallas and Justin, a city north of Fort Worth; compliance review specialists in Midlothian and Cedar Hill; a statistician in Tomball; and an information technology specialist in Conroe.
One Austin-based employee, an attorney, was terminated.
The federal document outlining the terminations, obtained by the American-Statesman, showed that at least 64 of the 969 workers represented by American Federation of Government Employees Local 252 who were laid off were based in Texas. This count does not include non-union employees affected by the layoffs or anyone who might have taken a voluntary buyout.
In a news release Tuesday night, the federal department said the total terminations account for almost 50% of the agency’s workforce, or nearly 2,000 workers. About 1,300 employees were laid off Tuesday, and nearly 600 took buyouts in recent weeks. Some employees will be placed on administrative leave as soon as March 21, though workers will be paid until June 9.
McMahon, whom the U.S. Senate confirmed as education secretary March 3, said the workforce reduction is part of a “commitment to efficiency, accountability and ensuring that resources are directed where they matter most.”
Education advocates, however, say the cuts will affect critical services, including civil rights accountability, protection for students with disabilities and distribution of federal aid and grants.
“This is not right,” Sheria Smith, president of the local AFGE 252 union, said at a news conference Wednesday. “What this administration has done is eliminated oversight, eliminated protection of American students, of Texas students, from K all the way to higher education.”
The federal department operates key funding programs for K-12 students who are in special education, low-income, bilingual, migrant and at-risk. Smith was terminated from her position at the Education Department civil rights office in Dallas, which folded with the layoffs.
The Dallas office, which Smith described as an accountability barometer for schools, served as a place where parents and students could access help with civil rights issues. The office received and reviewed thousands of civil rights complaints a year from Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, including claims dealing with sexual assault; gender, race or religious discrimination; and accommodations for students with disabilities, medical needs or learning challenges, Smith said. If the schools were not following the law, the office would mediate a solution between all parties. 
The Dallas office was one of six that closed across the nation, union officials said.
“The concern is that if you get rid of that entire office, where does all of that work go?” said Brittany Coleman, a chief shop steward at the union and an attorney who was terminated from the Dallas office.
Coleman is unable to contact students and parents in ongoing cases or share information about next steps, she said. She is not aware of any Education Department plan to replace the services the offices’ offered, and she said she fears students will face the brunt of the impact.
Project 2025, a nearly 900-word presidential transition plan published by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, calls for the federal administration to dismantle the Education Department and redirect more resources to the states.
Coleman expressed dismay about the Trump administration painting the Education Department as wasteful and ideological, which she called a gross mischaracterization. 
“We are here to make sure that children have equal opportunity to educational outcomes and that they can be the best that they can be. We are not here to tell school districts what to teach in their classrooms, what not to teach,” Coleman said. “It’s very frustrating and disappointing to hear that from people who are supposed to be leading our agency and leading our country who don’t have a full understanding or any understanding of what we actually do.”
Reducing the number of experienced people who administer education funding — such as money provided under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) or Title I, which largely serves low-income students — is bound to affect services, Texas State Teachers Association spokesman Clay Robison said.
Robison also worried that staff reductions could reduce the federal government’s response to civil rights complaints and legally mandated oversight of civil rights laws.
“It takes people to run these programs,” Robison said. “They don’t operate by themselves. Texas schools are already underfunded. This is a major source of critical funding for these programs.”
Texas received $14.7 billion in public education funding from the federal government in the 2022-23 school year, the most recent year with complete data, according to a February analysis by the Statesman.
The Hays school district, which gets about 10%-12% of its funding from the federal government, hadn’t heard about any changes as of Wednesday, spokesman Tim Savoy said.
The district’s more pressing concern was with state funding, he said.
“Without relief and adequate state funding this year, districts will have to make very difficult budgeting decisions for next school year because most fund balances, including that of Hays CISD, are significantly strained,” Savoy said.
Robison also worries that a federal restructuring of public education funding that puts more control in state hands could mean a shift in Texas on priorities away from the most in-need students.
“We fear for the future of these programs if they’re put in the hands of the leadership of the state of Texas,” Robison said.
In a statement, a Texas Education Agency spokesman said the agency isn’t aware of any changes to the federal Education Department’s funding distributions, but it would inform schools of any adjustments if or when those are handed down.

source

Leave a Comment

Canada to review the purchase of US-made F-35 fighter jets in light of Trump’s trade war – The Associated Press

Canada to review the purchase of US-made F-35 fighter jets in light of Trump’s trade war – The Associated Press

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
Prime Minister Mark Carney signs a document during cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill, Friday, March 14, 2025 in Ottawa. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press via AP)
TORONTO (AP) — Canada’s new Prime Minister Mark Carney has asked Defense Minister Bill Blair to review the purchase of America’s F-35 fighter jet to see if there are other options “given the changing environment,” a spokesman for Blair said Saturday.
Defense ministry press secretary Laurent de Casanove said the contract to purchase U.S. military contractor Lockheed Martin’s F-35 currently remains in place and Canada has made a legal commitment of funds for the first 16 aircraft. Canada agreed to buy 88 F-35’s two years ago.
Carney, who was sworn in on Friday, has asked Blair to work with the military “to determine if the F-35 contract, as it stands, is the best investment for Canada, and if there are other options that could better meet Canada’s needs,” de Casanove said.
“To be clear, the F-35 contract has not been canceled, but we need to do our homework given the changing environment, and make sure that the contract in its current form is in the best interests of Canadians and the Canadian Armed Forces,” de Casanove said.
U.S. President Donald Trump has declared a trade war on Canada and has threatened economic coercion to make it the 51st state. Trump’s threats have infuriated Canadians, who are booing the American anthem at NHL and NBA games. Some are canceling trips south of the border, and many are avoiding buying American goods when they can.
The government had budgeted about $19 billion Canadian (US$13 billion) for the F-35 purchase in what is the largest investment in the Royal Canadian Air Force in more than 30 years. The full life cycle of the program is expected to cost $70 billion Canadian.

A Lockheed Martin spokesperson said the company values it’s strong history with the Royal Canadian Air Force and said “questions about Canada’s procurement of the F-35 are best addressed by the Canadian and U.S. governments.”
The agreement to buy 88 jets came in 2023 as former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was set to meet with former U.S. President Joe Biden.
The Canadian government said in 2022 that Lockheed Martin was deemed to be the top-ranked bidder for a new fighter jet to replace aging F-18s, deciding against Boeing’s Super Hornet and the Swedish-built Saab Gripen. That ended years of deliberations over its aging fleet. The purchase would fulfill Canada’s obligations to defend North America’s air space.
The Swedish Saab proposal promised that assembly and maintenance would take place in Canada.
Portugal’s outgoing defense minister, Nuno Melo, said in an interview with a Portuguese newspaper published Thursday that “recent positions” taken by the U.S. compelled a rethink about the purchase of F-35s because the U.S. has become unpredictable.
Melo said the U.S. could in the future impose limits on the planes’ use, their maintenance or their components. Portugal is considering various options to replace F-16s.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

source

Leave a Comment

Health centers aim for boost in state funding as Medicaid cuts loom – Shelton Herald

Health centers aim for boost in state funding as Medicaid cuts loom – Shelton Herald

Gov. Ned Lamont and other state officials spoke about the potential impact federal cuts to Medicaid will have on Connecticut residents on March 3 at Charter Oak Health Center in Hartford. A group of health centers filed a petition with the state seeking a boost in Medicaid reimbursement rates on March 10.
Connecticut’s poorest and sickest residents may soon be facing more obstacles to getting care, according to the community health centers charged with treating them.
Blaming decades of lagging reimbursements from the state, some health centers are scaling back services and bracing for more cuts as President Trump eyes reductions in federal Medicaid funding.
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
Now the centers are taking on the state’s Department of Social Services, claiming that the formula used by the agency for reimbursements has left them with mounting losses. A group representing the centers filed a petition Tuesday with the agency in anticipation of a future lawsuit.
“We as health centers just can no longer afford to not get paid (for) appropriate costs when 60% of our patient base are actually Medicaid enrollees,” said Joanne Borduas, board chair of the Community Health Center Association of Connecticut. “We try to make it work, but it has become increasingly more difficult to do that when you're not compensated for the costs that you incur.”
The petition, formally known as a “declaratory ruling,” outlines the losses that Connecticut’s 17 federally qualified health centers say they sustain as a result of the state’s reimbursement rules. The state’s actions conflict with the mandate of the health centers and are “penny-wise and pound-foolish,” according to the petition.
In response to the filing, DSS spokesperson Christine Stuart said, “The department acknowledges receipt of the request and shall be analyzing and responding in due course and in compliance with statutes pertaining to petitions of state agencies for a declaratory ruling.”
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
Connecticut’s Medicaid per-visit reimbursement rates are the lowest in the region, according to an analysis cited in the petition. The state’s rate comes in at $163.37 per visit, compared to $297 in New Hampshire, $241.96 in Massachusetts and $196.79 in Vermont.
The disparity in rates hits hardest for costly services like dental care, said Borduas, who also serves as CEO of Torrington’s Community Health & Wellness Center. After years of shortfalls, her center ended its dental treatments last month, services that were used by 1,400 of the center’s 6,700 total patients last year. 

The Torrington center lost $350,000 on restorative dental procedures alone last year due the gap between costs and state reimbursements, Borduas said. As part of cutting dental services, the center laid off four staff members, she added.
Another center in Waterbury has also cut dental services this year, Borduas said, forcing poor patients in Northwest Connecticut to drive more than 40 minutes in some cases to reach dentists who accept Medicaid patients.
“We are all in the situation where we are looking seriously at what are we going to be able to afford to do,” Borduas said. “ Some of us will likely have to scale back services. Some will have to eliminate services.”
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
In concert with the petition to DSS, the centers have mobilized to support a bill in the state Legislature that would raise Medicaid rates for a range of health-care providers. 

Testifying before the Legislature’s Human Services Committee on Tuesday, Maggie Moffett of Fair Haven Community Health Care in New Haven spoke of increasingly frantic efforts to seek private funding “to fill the gaps left by insufficient Medicaid rates, funding that is never guaranteed and should never be expected to replace sustainable, predictable state support.”
Yvette Highsmith of Middletown’s Community Health Center warned of more reductions in services at locations including clinics at shelters and inside schools. 
“We’re already seeing some cutbacks and layoffs that are happening at our health centers, and the future would require further reductions in order to access care if we stay on the current path,” Highsmith said. 
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
Actions on the state level come as all Connecticut providers anticipate changes coming from Washington, where President Trump has asked for $880 billion in cuts to Medicaid over the next decade, according to the Associated Press. More than 1.2 million Connecticut residents rely on Medicaid for health care, DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves said earlier this month.

A new analysis of the impact of Medicaid cuts on individual states by the Urban Institute looks at the potential impact of proposed rollbacks in Medicaid expansion, projecting a potential $80 billion decrease in overall federal healthcare spending nationwide in 2026. 
Connecticut stands to lose more than $1 billion in Medicaid funds for the non-elderly in 2026, according to the analysis, for a decrease of 3.9% in overall healthcare spending — along with a $456 million revenue hit for hospitals in the state. 
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
Of our neighboring states, New York could lose $10 billion, for a decrease in healthcare spending of 7.1 percent, according to the Urban Institute, ranking it in the top 10 states for losses.

Connecticut health center leaders warned of the impact of federal cuts on their services, which were used by 440,000 patients last year at several hundred sites across the state, Bolduas said.
“We can’t know what’s going to happen, but we do know that there’s a freight train coming out of Washington and that we need Connecticut to support us now more than ever,” said Moffett of Fair Haven Community Health Care.
About
Contact
Services
Account

source

Leave a Comment

Leave a Comment

Who was Brian Thompson, the UnitedHealthCare CEO, Iowa native murdered in New York City? – Des Moines Register

Who was Brian Thompson, the UnitedHealthCare CEO, Iowa native murdered in New York City? – Des Moines Register

Brian Thompson, 50, the UnitedHealthCare CEO killed Wednesday in what authorities said was a targeted attack in New York City, had deep ties to Iowa.
Here’s what to know about him.
UnitedHealthCare has its headquarters in the Minneapolis metro, where Thompson lived in the suburb of Maple Grove with wife, Paulette, a doctor, and their two sons.
Thompson grew up in Jewell, in Hamilton County north of Ames, the son of Pat and the late Dennis Thompson. His father attended Ellsworth Community College and Iowa State University and was employed at grain elevators.
Brian Thompson had one brother, who lives in Chicago, according to his father’s obituary.
Thompson’s wife, who goes by Pauley, also grew up in Iowa, where her late father was a doctor in Webster City and later moved to Des Moines.
Thompson’s four sisters-in-law include Des Moines-area resident Maria Reveiz, who is a non-practicing physician, a yoga instructor and a co-founder of the downtown Noce jazz club.
Thompson graduated in 1993 from South Hamilton High School in Jewell. He was an “outstanding student,” according to Principal Todd Coy, then a health and physical education teacher.
His achievements included being an athlete and homecoming king, class president and valedictorian.
According to the Business Record, Thompson also was valedictorian when he graduated from the University of Iowa in 1997 with a bachelor’s in business administration, majoring in accounting.
His LinkedIn profile says he was a Collegiate, Carver, State of Iowa and Faculty scholar and was named outstanding accounting student in his junior and senior years.
After graduating, Thompson moved to Minneapolis to work as a CPA for the accounting firm PwC. There, he was a manager in auditing and later, transaction advisory services.
In 2004, Thompson joined UnitedHealthCare, one of the largest Fortune 500 companies, as director of corporate development. He became a vice president, then chief financial officer over increasingly important sectors of the business before being named CEO of UnitedHealthCare Medicare & Retirement in 2017. In 2019, he became CEO of the company’s government programs.
In 2021, he was chosen to be overall CEO, overseeing a global workforce of 140,000.
“Brian was an incredibly loving, generous, talented man who truly lived life to the fullest and touched so many lives. Most importantly, Brian was an incredibly loving father to our two sons and will be greatly missed.” — Paulette Thompson, wife, in a statement to Fox News
“He was a wonderful person and a wonderful father, and we are heartbroken and shocked.” — Maria Reveiz of Des Moines, sister-in-law
“He was a good person, and I am so sad.” — Elena Reveiz of Omaha, Nebraska, sister-in-law, speaking to the New York Times
“He was a devoted father, a good friend to many and a refreshingly candid colleague and leader.” — Mike Tuffin, president and CEO of commercial health insurance trade group AHIP
“Brian was an outstanding student. Held his academics as high as any student I’ve been around. Missing a question on a test was something that frustrated him. He was just a great kid to all.” — Todd Coy, principal, South Hamilton High School
“His achievements and character left a meaningful legacy within our schools and community.” — South Hamilton School District statement
“This is horrifying news and a terrible loss for the business and health care community in Minnesota. Minnesota is sending our prayers to Brian’s family and the UnitedHealthcare team.” — Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz
“He was just an incredible guy — nice, resourceful. This is just a total tragedy.” — Steve Parente, a former Trump administration health care official who worked with Thompson, to the Minneapolis Star Tribune
“I knew him to be a visionary leader who developed innovative ideas to take on some of the nation’s greatest challenges. His death is a great loss for our country and for the health care industry.” — Kim Keck, the chief executive of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, to the New York Times

source

Leave a Comment